Arthur Miller’s Crucible? Essay

Even until the plump few scenes of the play in Act VI reminder unflustered feels delinquencyy. He states I can non mount the gibbet care a saint. It is a fraud. Just kindred in Act II he lets his guilt dictate his behaviour. He feels he has already condemned himself to Hell so doing any(prenominal) more lying will make no difference. It is only in the very last scene, when he refuses to grant his confession to be pinned to the perform door, that he realises he can appease be inviolable and does the business thing.If the paper was nailed to the door the villagers would see that admonisher admitted to witchcraft and assume the another(prenominal)s were liars. slightly may argue that he is non a good military personnel withal at the end of the novel because when he does not allow for the confession to be nailed to the door this is pointing his pride he even shouts Because it is my name In his speech he repeats the word name earthy a(prenominal) cartridge clips whi ch testifys how significant his good reputation still is to him and this could be seen as him having dishonourable intentions.However this could be interpreted, I prize that the reason that Proctor does not necessity to have his name put on the church building door is because he does not want to be the person who is avocation his friends witches in the eyes of the villagers. He states I have given you my mortal leave me my name. In signing the paper he has be and committed a sin which due to his strict beliefs he would feel his person was not worthy of heaven, however he does not want to commit the sin of tarnishing the reputation of the other honest villagers.I think this shows Proctor to be a good man because he does not care that he has committed a lie and so condemned his soul to hell but does care that he should blacken Rebecca Nurses. In the same way he does not care if he is hanged as long as Rebecca can die with her good reputation intact. He as well as places emphas is on his own name because he does not want to commit the sin of lying to the whole village- this shows that he determine the proper(a)eouss he means in and does not want to lie to so many mountain.I think moth miller shows the struggle at heart Proctor to do the aright thing and die or to do the revile thing and live as a comparison with those who in the McCarthy governance wrongly impeach others to save themselves from imprisonment. moth miller is describeing the audience that spate like him who did get imprisoned were making the real sacrifice and doing the right thing whereas those who accused others were weak like bloody shame Warren and excessively cowardly to be imprisoned. earth-closets refusal to name other people who he has supposedly seen with the Devil also shows that he is a good man because he refuses to condemn others to the fate of death.Unlike the girls and many of the other accused witches he does not use this as an opportunity to look at revenge o n his enemies. In doing this he shows himself to be a moral superior to the other villagers and this also draws parallels with what Arthur Miller himself did when he was questioned by the kinfolk of Un- American Activities. He refused to be manipulated and went to prison for a short period rather than allowing himself to succumb to petty vengeance bred by the feeling of fear.Arthur Miller shows John as a hero here because he has do the right thing in the end and not lowered himself to the skanky acts of others in his community. Miller shows that people may act good and show good morals like Mary Warren when she shouts I believe in god but this is a facade because although to the society Mary looks like a reformed sinner in reality she is still sinning. However Proctor and others like Rebecca Nurse have to look like sinners and slaves of the Devil in order to keep to good morals.This caustic remark shown by Miller helps him to illustrate how the McCarthy regime like the witch t rials instead of make goodness bred vengeance and evil. At the end of the play we know John Proctor to be a good man. His initial flaws of guilt and criminal conversation were countered by his eventual admittance of his sins and impasseing up for the truth. His decisions to eventually tell the truth and die rather than lying and tarnishing the reputation of the villagers show what a good person he was.His flaws were used by Miller to give his message to American society people in their time who were being prosecuted by John McCarthy may have flaws just like Proctor but really the true evil lay within the House itself and that the people were innocent and just victims to green-eyed monster and the injustice of fad just like Proctor was in capital of Oregon. The main technique of irony the judges and accusers seemed like moral superiors yet the judges were manipulative and the accuser vengeful whereas Proctor who was flawed and thus seemed sinful did not succumb to either evils.T his helps strengthen Millers message about the people who accused others of Communism and the House itself. The universal purpose is to remind people that jealousy and hysteria are dangerous things and that even ideal societies like the democracy of America and the theocracy of Salem can be unjust and uncivilised and this is shown bright by the harsh and cruel manipulative manner of the judges. In Salems idea of goodness Proctor was a good man at the end of the play because he was sorry for his sins and believed in God he even demonstrated this by refusing to lie at the end. homogeneous all humans he had flaws but he overcame these by doing the right thing at the end. In Millers and modern times, he is also a good man because we respect people who stand up for what they believe in like Proctor did in the courts and also we value truth he stood for in an ever increasing origination of media lies and propaganda. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This learner written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.